Search for: "Robert V. Rodgers" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Oral Argument in case# 09-3364
2 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
Robert Rodgers (criminal case) [uploaded: 04/02/2010] [read post]
US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals: New Oral Arguments - http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov
Seven Ways of Looking at Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and the Supreme Court Under Chief Justice John Roberts
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
  (Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Inducement of High-Level Employee May Contribute to a Long Notice Period Award
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Rodgers v. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
"This Kiss, This Kiss..."
19 May 2014, 12:05 pm
in Judge and Jurist: Essays in Memory of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry 473 (Oxford 2013). [read post]
Law & Humanities Blog - http://lawlit.blogspot.com/
Walden v. Fiore: The Supreme Court Turns to Personal Jurisdiction Issues
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm by Rodger Citron
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
“Supreme Court Backs Georgia College Student’s Free Speech Suit; The 8-to-1 ruling said courts may hear suits seeking only nominal damages; Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., dissenting, said the majority had turned judges into advice columnists”
8 Mar 2021, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
” Jack Rodgers of Courthouse News Service reports that “Supreme Court Says Even a Symbolic Dollar Can Redress Injury. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
President Trump Clashes with Legal Oversight in Three Cases to be Argued at the Supreme Court
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
PTAB reverses 103: statement that combining pieces is predictable doesn't explain why a POSITA would combine
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
Gore & Assocs v. [read post]
All Things Pros - http://allthingspros.blogspot.com/
PTAB reverses 103: statement that combining pieces is predictable doesn't explain why a POSITA would combine
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
Gore & Assocs v. [read post]
All Things Pros - http://allthingspros.blogspot.com/
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.: Of Corporate Registration Statutes and Personal Jurisdiction
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley and Rodger Citron
In Mallory v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Personal Jurisdiction Makes Strange Bedfellows: An Assessment of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron and Laura Dooley
Our nomination for the most intriguing case of the last Supreme Court term is Mallory v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The last common law justice?
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The following essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens is by Rodger D. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: The Supreme Court Considers Whether an Independent Agency with a Single Director Who Can Be Removed Only “For Cause” is Constitutional
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
In Myers v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Roe and Dobbs as Defining Cases for the Supreme Court and the Justices Who Wrote the Majority Opinions
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Just as Roe v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
“In Age Bias Case, Justices Discuss ‘O.K. Boomer’ and Eggless Cakes; A lively Supreme Court argument on protecting federal workers from age discrimination included telling remarks from several justices”
15 Jan 2020, 6:00 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court oral argument in Babb v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Monday round-up
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at Roberts’ dual roles in the new year comes from Darren Samuelson at Politico (via How Appealing). [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
“Supreme Court Limits Sweep of Law on Mandatory Minimum Sentences; Violent felonies committed recklessly do not count in deciding whether 15-year terms are required under the Armed Career Criminal Act, the justices ruled”
10 Jun 2021, 5:40 pm by Howard Bashman
” Today in Borden v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Round-Up
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
At FindLaw, Rodger Citron has this essay on the case. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Oral Arguments - 10/7/09
7 Oct 2009, 7:00 pm by R.J. MacReady
C'est la vie.PD-1263-08, Rodger Eugene Mansfield, Jr. v. [read post]
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals blog - http://www.txccablog.com/
“Supreme Court strikes down violent criminal provision, rules against newspaper seeking food stamps data”
24 Jun 2019, 6:40 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com